In a previous editorial,1 I (the first author) briefly introduced some limitations of systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRwMs) based on my own experiences. For instance, the conclusions from an SRwM can change significantly after the inclusion or exclusion of a few studies. Moreover, the discussions in some SRwMs were perplexing. Some of the confounding interpretations might be attributed to the lack of experience of authors who could not profoundly elaborate on the factors and potential moderators behind the discrepancies between (apparently) similar studies. While these limitations may be overcome with more refined inclusion and exclusion criteria and the participation of more experienced authors during the elaboration of the SRwM, in this editorial we briefly elaborate how sport scientists and practitioners may embrace the results from systematic reviews.
© Copyright 2024 International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. All rights reserved.